VeloTech is a fast-growing, mid-sized manufacturer of premium electric bicycles (e-bikes) based in Europe. Their flagship model, the CityGlide, accounts for 60% of their annual revenue and is highly dependent on a specialized, custom-designed Lithium-Ion Battery Controller.
To keep costs down and maintain competitive pricing, VeloTech's procurement team implemented a lean, Just-in-Time (JIT) manufacturing strategy. Three years ago, they made the decision to single-source the battery controllers from a highly reputable supplier, ElectroCom, located in Taiwan.
Why ElectroCom? * By guaranteeing ElectroCom 100% of their controller business, VeloTech secured a massive 18% volume discount.
ElectroCom’s quality control is exceptional (defect rate under 0.1%).
Because deliveries arrive weekly, VeloTech only holds two weeks of safety stock in their European warehouse, saving significantly on inventory holding costs.
The Incident
In late August, just as VeloTech is ramping up production for the critical holiday shopping season, two simultaneous events occur:
Environmental Disruption: A severe, unprecedented typhoon hits the coast of Taiwan, severely damaging the local power grid and flooding several industrial parks, including the one where ElectroCom operates.
Geopolitical Tension: At the same time, regional trade disputes lead to sudden, strict customs inspections at major ports, causing massive bottlenecks for ocean freight leaving the region.
ElectroCom informs VeloTech that their factory will be offline for at least three weeks for repairs, and the backlog at the ports means that even after production resumes, shipping times will be delayed by an additional four weeks.
The Immediate Impact
- VeloTech only has two weeks of battery controllers in stock.
- Sourcing a new supplier for a custom-designed electronic component requires a minimum of 3 to 4 months for prototyping, testing, and quality certification.
- Within 14 days, VeloTech’s assembly lines grind to a halt.
- Hundreds of thousands of dollars in holiday orders are at risk of being canceled by retailers, and competitors are poised to steal VeloTech's market share.
Discussion Questions
Looking back at VeloTech’s original procurement strategy, what specific types of risks did the procurement team fail to adequately assess?
If VeloTech had used a Risk Matrix, where would a "major supplier factory shutdown" fall in terms of Probability and Impact?
Assume you are brought in as the new Director of Procurement for VeloTech after this crisis is resolved. How would you apply the 4 T's (Treat, Transfer, Tolerate, Terminate) to prevent this from happening again?
